Free Essays on Evolution of Business Ethics in today’Legal Environment

Evolution of Business Ethics in today’Legal Environment Despite the factors contributing to the evolution of the business environment, Aristole’s politike is still relevant and applicable today. Business ethics in a legal environment have evolved over the years because of the way we do business. As the times change, people and their morals change. When people’s morals change, so do the way they do business. In the past businesses and companies only had to address mediocre unethical acts. Now we have Martha Stewart illegally buying stock tips. Companies’ ethics are actually a sign of the times. Many attributes contribute to the unethical behavior of many professional and business persons. These contributions include economic, political and social attributes. They not only plague our country but the world as a whole. In this report, we will discuss three contributing factors that legally affect the business environment and how Aristotle’s politike show their relevance in today’s business world. In addition, we will address the major unethical acts that have impacted two major companies, Enron and Author Anderson. One’s first question, what is Business Ethics? Our text defines it as a branch of applied ethics is the study and determination of what is right and good in business settings. Many people in the business world are familiar with their company’s ethics because it is part of their training when they begin employment. The federal government also has their own set of ethics that they give to each employee upon their entrance on duty. Codes of conduct are also address in many businesses’ code of ethics. Many of the unethical issues that were dealt with years ago only had to do with social issues like affairs between colleagues. The first major ethical issues that became legal issues were that of Richard Nixon’s resignation as a result of the â€Å"Watergate† scandal. The burglary was commi... Free Essays on Evolution of Business Ethics in today’Legal Environment Free Essays on Evolution of Business Ethics in today’Legal Environment Evolution of Business Ethics in today’Legal Environment Despite the factors contributing to the evolution of the business environment, Aristole’s politike is still relevant and applicable today. Business ethics in a legal environment have evolved over the years because of the way we do business. As the times change, people and their morals change. When people’s morals change, so do the way they do business. In the past businesses and companies only had to address mediocre unethical acts. Now we have Martha Stewart illegally buying stock tips. Companies’ ethics are actually a sign of the times. Many attributes contribute to the unethical behavior of many professional and business persons. These contributions include economic, political and social attributes. They not only plague our country but the world as a whole. In this report, we will discuss three contributing factors that legally affect the business environment and how Aristotle’s politike show their relevance in today’s business world. In addition, we will address the major unethical acts that have impacted two major companies, Enron and Author Anderson. One’s first question, what is Business Ethics? Our text defines it as a branch of applied ethics is the study and determination of what is right and good in business settings. Many people in the business world are familiar with their company’s ethics because it is part of their training when they begin employment. The federal government also has their own set of ethics that they give to each employee upon their entrance on duty. Codes of conduct are also address in many businesses’ code of ethics. Many of the unethical issues that were dealt with years ago only had to do with social issues like affairs between colleagues. The first major ethical issues that became legal issues were that of Richard Nixon’s resignation as a result of the â€Å"Watergate† scandal. The burglary was commi...

Descartes Essays - Ren Descartes, Epistemology, Thought, Free Essays

Descartes Essays - Ren Descartes, Epistemology, Thought, Free Essays Descartes Descartes Meditations Descartes Cogito Ergo Sum (I am, I exist) argument is a complex one. In many ways, he constructs a convincing argument for the existence of the self, and for the process of the thinking being, the essence of that self. In this meditation on his philosophy, Descartes on numerous attempts tries to convince both the readers, as well as himself, of his theory that we must reject all of our present ideas and beliefs and start from nothing. He believes that the only thing that has any certainty at this point is his own existence as a thinking being. Everything else, which he has learned throughout his entire life and believed in, is to be thrown out because it is not known clearly and distinctly. Descartes method and theory on knowledge was well planned and carefully thought out. It is evident that he spent a great deal of time determining the principles that he would use as determinants for judging whether a specific idea was justified and true. In my opinion, there are some flaws contained in Descartes argument. Among these flaws are Descartes apparent determination to prove his theory on his individual existence in the world and the existence of G-d to backup and prove himself and his theories. At the beginning of meditation two, Descartes is stuck in the middle of nothingness. He has nothing, nothing to believe in and everything around him he regards as false. This is because he cannot believe what he has learned and he is also unable to trust his senses due to the fact that they deceive him. He feels like he is drowning in a whirlpool and cannot reach the top and get out nor can he put his feet on the bottom and stand. Everything in the world at this point he has called into doubt, including himself. Everything that he has ever seen, learned or thought is now external from what he deems to be true and he is beginning his knowledge from non-existence. Descartes although is certain of one thing, nothing (but to be certain of nothing is still to be certain of something?). Descartes is a rational thinker and he rationalizes through his studies that nothing in the world is known. He decided to re-start his belief process and call everything he has ever believed in, into doubt. He is debating complex ideas in his head, changing his mind and objectively making decisions, so his existence in a world has to be a certainty. The fact that he is having these thoughts, whether right or wrong proves mental capacity. Descartes then states with certainty Cogito ergo sum (I am, I exist). This is the first accurate idea that Descartes knows with any conviction, he knows that he is a thinking being. Descartes still does not know what he is, he says but what then am I? A thing that thinks. What is that? A thing that doubts, understands, affirms, denies, wills, refuses, and that also imagines and senses. He is aware of his mental capacity and knows he thinks, deliberates and makes decisions, but he still rejects his body and his senses. O ne major flaw found in Descartes argument is that while critically examining, and then rejecting, mostly everything in the world around him, he maintained that he could prove the existence of G-d, beyond a shadow of a doubt. For thousands of years, people have been trying to prove G-ds existence but he has yet to be successful. It seems to me that Descartes showed a display of arrogance in supposing that he could devise a method of proving the existence of G-d, doing so without a great deal of difficulty. At one point in his discourse on method, Descartes sets out a code of morals, which he plans to abide by. Descartes states that he plans to obey the laws and the customs of my country, constantly holding on to the religion in which, by G-ds grace, I had been instructed from my childhood . It is quite apparent from this passage, that Descartes had accepted and embraced the idea of G-d long before he even began to question it. With this pre-judgement of

Starting a Clinical Trial Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Starting a Clinical Trial - Research Paper Example A clinical trial will now involve such investigations in human beings. The effects of such practice will have been investigated before approval for a clinical trial (Friedman, Furberg & DeMets, 2010). In order to determine if the research question is important enough to pursue further investigation through a clinical trial, the following criteria can be used. Clinical trials, like other research studies, are guided by specific criteria. It is important to: Determining the problem is an exercise similar to the formulation of a research question in the initial processes of the research study. It involves identifying the population affected, why such a population is the target and the issue of interest. In this case, a specific study has already been selected; â€Å"Chlorhexidine decreases the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care unit patients: a randomized clinical trial†. The problem here is; the patients in intensive care unit faced with a major problem of ventilator-associated Pneumonia. Research has however, established that this ventilator-associated pneumonia can be prevented by use of Chlorhexidine. In this research, the results have been confirmed; Chlorhexidine helps in preventing the occurrence of the disease. The next step should be investigating the correct dosage that will increase the percentage of the number of patients that it protects. It is expected that with such results, Chlorhexidine will help reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia cases. Already the research is a randomized clinical trial. 61 patients were involved in the study to assess the effects of Chlorhexidine on VAP prevention. It specifically assessed whether â€Å"oral care with swabbing four times daily with CHX reduced VAP development† (O ¨zcaka et al., 588). The results are supportive of further clinical trials. In this case, only 61 patients were involved in the study. Further clinical trials involve phases I to III of clinical trials